33
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
CAREGIVER REPORTED INCIDENCE OF STATUS EPILEPTICUS IN PERSONS
WITH EPILEPSY IN ENUGU, SOUTHEAST NIGERIA.
Nkeiruka C1,
ABSTRACT
Background: Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency which may occur in people with epilepsy. Ascertaining the incidence of status epilepticus in the community is wrought with many challenges and few reports exist in
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe reported incidence of status epilepticus among epilepsy patients attending neurol- ogy outpatient clinic in Enugu.
Methods: This was
Results: Data of 154 patients were reviewed and analysed. A total of 56(36.4%) confirmed that they had experienced seizures that could be described as status epilepticus (males (36.3%) and females (36.5%)). P=0.98. About 54.5% of those with stroke and 47.9% of patients who had cluster seizures reported a history of status epilepticus. Factors that correlated with having status epilepticus were history of cluster seizures, family history of epilepsy and having no past history of seizure related admissions.
Conclusions: The reported incidence of status epilepticus among epilepsy patients attending tertiary hospital clinics in Enugu is high. Factors that may account for this includes,
Keywords: Status Epilepticus, Cluster seizures, Epilepsy, Nigeria.
INTRODUCTION
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency which may occur in people with epilepsy (PWE) as well as in those with- out epilepsy. It is associated with high morbidity, mortality and low quality of life thus in PWE episodes of SE have added clinical relevance (1,2). In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy defined SE as a bilateral
36.1to 81.1 per 100 000 per year based on the new ILAE 2015 definition of SE(5,6).
Few studies have reported on SE in Africa(7,8). Bhalla et al (7) in 2014 reported an incidence of 10.8 per 100 000 population and Kariuki et al (8) reported a prevalence rate of 2.3 per 1000. Apart from using different definitions for SE, these studies included people without epilepsy and children. Based on few available studies in SSA, SE in Africa is reported to be high in Children,
to be seizures with predominantly motor features. In Austria, the age and sex adjusted incidence of a first episode of non- convulsive SE and SE with prominent motor phenomena was 12.1 and 24 per 100 000 adults per year, respectively (5).
In
Despite the potential for poor outcomes of SE in PWE, there is little, or no research related to the subject in Nigeria. Recogniz- ing incidence and patterns of SE is helpful in preventing unto- ward consequences of SE. The aim of this study was to describe the caregiver reported frequency and pattern of SE in PWE attending neurology outpatient clinic in Enugu.
1Department of Medicine University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Nigeria. 2Department of Medicine Enugu State University Teaching Hospital Enugu, Nigeria.3Department of Medicine Federal Medical Center Owerri.4 Odimegwu Ojukwu Teaching Hospital Awka.
*All correspondences email: [email protected]
METHODS
This was a
Study participants :The plan was to collect the data of all con- secutive consenting epilepsy patients who attend the neurology clinic of these hospitals. All consecutive consenting patients accompanied by caregivers in which case the caregiver must have been an eyewitness of the seizure were included in the study. We excluded patients with possible psychogenic non- epileptic seizures and single epileptic seizures. Cases where seizure duration could not be truly determined with some level of certainty were excluded from the present analysis. Cases of incomplete data or illegible lasting less than 5 minutes were also excluded. The study period was 9 months.
Data collection tools and procedures: Data was collected using
a
Completed questionnaires were retrieved the same day. In cases where the respondent did not understand English, a translation in the local language was used. In such cases, the items on the questionnaire were read out to the respondents, and their en- dorsed options were ticked by the investigator. The study proto- col was reviewed by the ethics committee of the Teaching Hos- pitals. All participants gave their informed consent after reading or having the consent form read for them.
34
Operational definitions: SE was defined as seizures lasting more than 5 minutes for generalized seizures and 10 minutes for focal seizures3. CS was defined as series of seizures close- ly grouped in time with shorter than normal inter ictal periods or as an increase over the patient's typical seizure frequency in a day or week (15). Epilepsy was defined based on the In- ternational League Against Epilepsy criteria.
Data analysis: The SPSS version 22 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA) was used for data management and statistical analysis. Data were presented in tables. The statistical methods included
RESULTS
Description of participants: Data of 154 PWE were reviewed and analysed. Males were 80(51.9%) and 74(48.1%) were females. The male to female ratio was 0.9:1. Most participants were aged
Seizure characteristics: Reported seizures characteristics are shown in Table 2. The mean age of onset of epilepsy in the cohort was 20.9 years (with a median of 17 years); earlier in females (14.4 years) than males 26.3 years) (p <0.01). The peak age of onset of epilepsy in SE was 0 to 9 years. The mean time taken from the age of onset to the age of going to the hospital was similar in both males and females. P=0.2. The
35
Table 1. Age and gender distribution Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics.
Gender |
Male (%) |
Female (%) |
Total (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N (%) |
80(51.9) |
74(48.1) |
154(100) |
0.63 |
Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
Mean age (sd) |
35.8(18.9) |
28.7(14.5) |
32.4(17.3) |
0.01 |
Median age |
29.5 |
28.7 |
26 |
|
Age group |
|
|
|
|
< 20 |
11(13.8) |
14(18.9) |
25(16.2) |
|
29(36.3) |
37(50) |
66(42.9) |
|
|
15(18.8) |
13(17.6) |
28(18.2) |
|
|
8(10) |
3(4.1) |
11(7.1) |
|
|
≥50 |
17(21.3) |
7(9.5) |
24(15.6) |
0.1 |
Level of education |
|
|
|
|
No education |
15(18.8) |
4(5.4) |
19(12.3) |
|
Primary |
13(16.3) |
9(12.2) |
22(14.3) |
|
Junior secondary |
6(7.5) |
14(18.9) |
20(13) |
|
Senior secondary |
30(40.7) |
32(43.2) |
62(40.3) |
|
Tertiary |
16(20) |
15(20.3) |
31(20.1) |
0.04 |
Occupation |
|
|
|
|
Students |
17(21.3) |
28(37.8) |
45(29.2) |
|
Employed |
37(46.3) |
31(41.9) |
68(44.2) |
|
Unemployed |
17(21.3) |
13(17.6) |
30(19.5) |
|
Retired |
9(11.3) |
2(2.7) |
11(7.1) |
0.05 |
Substance use |
|
|
|
|
Alcohol use |
22(27.5) |
6(8.1) |
28(18.2) |
<0.01 |
Tobacco |
11(13.8%) |
3(4.1) |
14(9.1) |
0.04 |
Marijuana |
5(6.3) |
- |
5(3.2) |
0.03 |
Glue |
- |
1(1.4) |
1(0.6) |
0.3 |
Alternative treatment |
|
|
|
|
Herbal |
25(31.3) |
15(20.3) |
40(26) |
0.12 |
Prayer house |
16(20) |
20(27) |
36(23.4) |
0.3 |
Drug store |
7(8.8) |
3(4.1) |
10(6.5) |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
Table 2. Gender distribution of seizure characteristics |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender |
Male (%) |
Female (%) |
Total (%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age of onset |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean age (sd) |
26.3(21.7) |
14.4(14.9) |
20.9(15.3) |
<0.01 |
|
Median age |
18 |
12 |
17 |
|
|
Time taken before first hospital visit |
|
|
|
|
|
(years) |
1.6(4.5) |
2.7(5.3) |
2.1(0.4) |
0.2 |
|
Mean age (sd) |
|||||
Median (range) |
|
||||
Last seizure episode |
|
|
|
|
|
< 24 hours |
18(22.5) |
20(27) |
38(24.7) |
|
|
18(22.5) |
16(21.6) |
34(22.1) |
|
||
16(20) |
12(16.2) |
28(18.2) |
|
||
21(26.3) |
18(24.3) |
39(25.3) |
|
||
>6 months |
7(8.8) |
8(10.8) |
15(9.7) |
0.97 |
|
Family History |
16(19.8) |
5(7.2) |
21(14) |
0.03 |
|
Prediction of seizures |
|
|
|
|
|
Always |
21(26.3) |
17(23) |
38(24.7) |
|
|
Sometimes |
17(21.3) |
29(39.2) |
46(29.9) |
|
|
Never |
42(52.5) |
28(37.8) |
70(45.5) |
0.05 |
|
Seizures are similar |
54(67.5) |
53(71.6) |
107(69.5) |
0.58 |
|
History of status epilepticus |
29(36.3) |
27(36.5) |
56(36.4) |
0.98 |
|
Seizure related admissions |
|||||
3(3.8) |
11(14.9) |
14(9.1) |
0.02* |
||
|
|||||
Total |
80(51.9) |
74(48.1) |
154(100) |
|
A total of 56(36.4%) confirmed that they had experienced pro- longed seizures that lasted more than 5 minutes for generalized seizures and 10 minutes for focal seizures in the past. Sex distri- bution SE showed that males (36.3%) and females (36.5%) re- ported a history of status in the past. P=0.98. Seizure related admissions were reported in 14(9.1%) of PWE more in females 11(14.9%) than males 3(3.8%). See Table 3. Figure 1, showed that history of SE appears to be bimodal; 40% below the age of 20 years and 50% after the after of 50 years.
Table 3 shows the proportion of PWE with various risk factors who had SE. About 54.5% of those with stroke, 47.9% of pa- tients who had CS reported a history of SE. A large proportion of dementia cases also had CS and SE although the overall number was small. Factors that correlated with past history of SE were: history of CS, family history of epilepsy and having no past history of seizure related admissions.
Table 3. Distribution of status epilepticus by various documented risk factors
Risk factor |
N(%) |
Status N(%)# |
|
|
|
No risk factor |
84(54.5) |
28 (33.3) |
Cluster seizures |
73(47.4) |
35(47.9) |
Traumatic brain injury |
34(22.1) |
12(35.3) |
Stroke |
11(7.1) |
6(54.5) |
Alcohol abuse |
5(1.9) |
1(20) |
Mental retardation |
4(1.9) |
- |
Dementia |
4(2.6) |
3(75) |
Meningitis |
3(1.3) |
2(66.7) |
Migraine |
3(1.9) |
1(33.3) |
AIDS |
3(0.6) |
- |
Brain surgery |
2(2.6) |
- |
Down’s syndrome |
1(3.2) |
1(100) |
Psychosis |
1(0.6) |
- |
Hypertension |
20(13.3) |
10(18.5) |
Diabetes |
5(3.2) |
1(20) |
Heart failure |
1(0.6) |
- |
Total |
154(100)* |
54(36) |
*Multiple risk factor was recorded. #Percentage of risk factors.
37
Table 4. Correlates of status epilepticus. Table 4. Correlates of status epilepticus.
|
Status Epilepticus |
|
|
r |
|
Gender |
||
|
||
Status epilepticus |
- |
|
Seizure cluster |
23(<0.01) |
|
Age |
||
Gender (1 male, 2 female) |
||
Family history |
0.17(0.03) |
|
Age of onset of epilepsy |
0.12(0.15) |
|
Seizure type (1 generalized, 0 focal) |
0.01(0.74) |
|
History injuries (1 yes, 2 No) |
0.12(0.15) |
|
Seizure related admissions (1 yes, 0 No) |
||
First point of care (0 hospital, 1 other places) |
0.04(0.59) |
|
Seizure semiology (1 similar, 0 varies) |
||
Last seizure (1 less than 24 hours to 6 greater than 6 |
0.09(0.29) |
|
months) |
|
DISCUSSION
Seizure frequency and pattern are strong determinants of quali- ty of life in epilepsy as well as the burden of epilepsy. Alt- hough in PWE, seizures are generally sporadic or even infre- quent, however, they may experience prolonged seizures (status epilepticus) and even cluster seizures. Identification of SE in the community is very important because of the associat- ed high morbidity, mortality as well as the associated high di- rect and indirect health costs in epilepsy(13,14).
In the index study, the male to female ratio of PWE with a his- tory of SE was 0.9:1. SE was reported by 36.4%: males (36.3%) and females 36.5%). P=0.98. About 54.5% of PWE who had stroke experienced SE. A large proportion of demen- tia cases also had SE although the numbers were small. Fur- thermore, the age distribution of SE was bimodal (before 20 years and after 50 years), and a large proportion of PWE with SE also had experienced SC. Factors that correlated with SE were history of SC, family history of epilepsy and no history of seizure related admissions.
The seizure related characteristics in the index study were sim- ilar to other published works from Nigeria (16,17). The age distribution of the patients in the index study may suggest a changing pattern of epilepsy risk factors or increasing aware- ness of epilepsy in the country. Younger
findings support previous reports on seizure control in PWE in Nigeria(17). These may be related to several factors including
The sex and age distribution of PWE who reported a history of SE showed same sex distribution and a bimodal age distribu- tion. In the US, Dham et al(19) reported a bimodal distribution of SE with the first peak in the first decade of life and the sec- ond after 60 years. Double peak in the incidence of SE was also reported in a review by Sanchez et al(4). Current demo- graphic in Nigeria and SSA have shown a rise in the older age group; therefore, SE is likely to become a common problem and an important health issue in years to come. Similar to some previous studies, the gender distribution of SE has been report- ed to be similar in males and females. Male to female ratio varied also from one study to the other with some reporting more males and others more females (4). In Ethiopia, Amare et al(20) reported a
There are no
The definition of SE has evolved over the past decades, how- ever, the incidence of SE has not differed much using different definitions. Leitinger et al (5) reported that reducing the diag- nostic time of SE increased the incidence only moderately by 10%. The overall incidence of SE range from 5.2 to 41 per 100,000/year (7) with an average of 9.9 per 100 000. Kantanen, et al (6) reported an annual
The age and sex adjusted incidence of a first episode of SE,
The incidence of SE is affected by age, geographical location, comorbidities and possibly family history (6,21). Similar to the index study in most adult studies there is a spike after the age of 50 (5,22). Geographical factors affect socio cultural charac- teristics of the population as well as disease pattern(4). For an example, whereas in Kenya (8), Malaria and HIV were associ- ated with SE, in Finland (6) alcohol withdrawal was the single most common acute symptomatic etiology in the study by Kantenen et al (6,23). The relationship between SE and non- adherence and no previous hospital visit have also been docu- mented in PWE(8). These two factors are important in SSA because large treatment gap and poverty.
In the index study, SE was reported in 54.5% of those with a history of stroke and 35.3% of those with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Other cases with small but significant proportion of SE were those with meningitis and alcohol abuse. These findings are in support of previous studies that reported stokes, TBI and infections as common causes of SE a pattern which tends to vary between countries (4). SE has also been reported to be common in neurodegenerative disorders (4). African studies have reported infections and
38
In a
Factors that may precipitate/cause SE can also precipitate SC. These risk factors include TBI, longer duration of epilepsy and poor seizure control(26). SE has a direct effect on mortality, quality of life and increased health cost. It leads to repeated admissions in the emergency room or even in the intensive care unit. In the index study seizure related admissions negatively correlated to a history of SE. The reason for this is not clear. Large prospective studies are needed to shed more light on this finding. SE is a condition for which data on incidence, etiolo- gy, risk factors and outcomes are required for proper decision- making and for the allocation of resources by policy makers. These resources need to be used in the development of strate- gies that help improve prevention, diagnosis and reduce mor- bidity and mortality.
Limitations: This study has some limitations. Firstly, data used in this might have been affected by recall bias which may affect the true incidence of SE. Secondly, the timing of seizures may not be very accurate and subjective. Thirdly, only predom- inately motor seizures are observable, and subtle form of sei- zure are likely to be overlooked. Our study addressed only sur- vivors. Mortality rates of SE are important in assessing the true burden of this complication of epilepsy.
Finally, questionnaires were administered in English which may introduce some language bias because some medical terms in English do not have direct local equivalents. These limitations notwithstanding, this study has provided data for comparison for future studies. Large
Conclusion:The reported lifetime history of SE among PWE attending a tertiary hospital clinic in Enugu is high. This may suggest both poor seizure control and/or seizure severity. Care- ful patient education will improve both adherence and emergen- cy management of epilepsy to reduce the morbidity of epilepsy in the community.
REFERENCES.
1.Scott RC, Surtees RAH, Neville BGR. Status epilepticus: pathophysiology, epidemiology, and outcomes. Arch Dis Child
2.Penovich P, A Clinical Update on the Importance of Recognizing Seizure Clusters. https://www.medscape.org/ viewarticle/863062
3.Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D, Rossetti AO, Scheffer IE, Shinnar S, et al. A definition and classification of status epilepticus– report of the ILAE Task Force on classification of status epilepticus. Epilepsia
4.Sánchez S, Rincon F. Status Epilepticus: Epidemiology and Public Health Needs. J. Clin. Med. 2016, 5, 71
5.Leitinger M, Trinka E, Giovannini G, Zimmermann G, Florea C, Rohracher A et al. Epidemiology of status epilepticus in adults; population based study on incidence, causes and outcomes. Epilepsia
6.Kantanen
7.Bhalla D, Tchalla AE, Mignard C, et al. First‐ever
39
8.Kariuki SM,
9.Newton CR, Kariuki SM. Status epilepticus in
10.Sadarangani M, Seaton C, Scott JA, Ogutu B, Edwards T, Prins A et al. Incidence and outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in Kenyan children: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol
11.Haut SR. Seizure clustering. Epilepsy Behav.
12.Haut SR, Shinnar S, Moshé SL, O'Dell C, Legatt AD. The association between seizure clustering and convulsive status epilepti- cus in patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Epilepsia.
13.Horváth L, Fekete I, Molnár M, Válóczy R, Sándor M, Fekete K. The Outcome of Status Epilepticus and
14.Penovich PE, Buelow J, Steinberg K, Sirven J, Wheless J, Burden of Seizure Clusters on Patients With Epilepsy and Caregivers Survey of Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives. The Neurologist
15.Penovich P, A Clinical Update on the Importance of Recognizing Seizure Clusters. https://www.medscape.org/ viewarticle/863062
16.
17.Onwuekwe I O, Onodugo O D,
18.Epilepsy: a public health imperative World Health Organization 2019. Last accessed
19.Dham BS, Hunter K, Rincon F. The epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States. Neurocrit Care.
20.Amare, A.; Zenebe, G.; Hammack, J.; Davey, G. Status epilepticus: Clinical presentation, cause, outcome and predictors of death in 119 Ethiopian patients. Epilepsia 2008, 49,
21.Ong CT, Sheu SM, Tsai CF, Wong YS, Chen SC.
22.Sairanen JJ, Kantanen AM, Hyppölä HT, Kälviäinen RK. Treatment delay in status epilepticus – more effective pre hospital symptom recognition warranted. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2019;27(1):28.
23.Kantanen AM, Reinikainen M, Parviainen I, Kälviäinen R.
24.Amare, A.; Zenebe, G.; Hammack, J.; Davey, G. Status epilepticus: Clinical presentation, cause, outcome and predictors of death in 119 Ethiopian patients. Epilepsia 2008, 49,
25.Neligan A, Shorvon S D,. Frequency and Prognosis of Convulsive Status Epilepticus of Different Causes A Systematic Review Arch Neurol.
26.Jallon P, Zifkin B G. Seizure precipitants. In: Engels J jr, Pedley T A eds Epilepsy a Comprehensive Textbook. 2nd edition. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Health. Philadelphia 2008. Volume 1. Pp
27.Sillanpää M, Schmidt D. Seizure clustering during drug treatment affects seizure outcome and mortality of childhood onset epi- lepsy. Brain.
28.Haut SR, Shinnar S, Moshé SL. Seizure clustering: risks and outcomes. Epilepsia.